{"id":3805,"date":"2017-02-22T08:00:28","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T08:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/?p=3805"},"modified":"2017-02-22T08:02:21","modified_gmt":"2017-02-22T08:02:21","slug":"coffee-climate-change-and-communication","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/?p=3805","title":{"rendered":"Talking about coffee and climate change"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"coffee<\/a>
Coffee and chocolate, both of which may be badly affected by climate change.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Last week the Royal Meteorological Society<\/a><\/span> hosted an afternoon of talks and discussion titled “Avoiding Myth, Mayhem and Myopia: the challenge of climate science communication”<\/a><\/span>. The meeting coincided with a social media campaign “#showthelove<\/a><\/span>” which aimed to highlight something that you fear is at risk because of climate change. As coffee is definitely one of those things that is at risk<\/a><\/span> (and indeed is already being affected<\/a><\/span> by climate change),\u00a0I went along to the discussion\u00a0to see what is already being done to communicate climate science and also, what we can do as science communicators.<\/p>\n

Although I do not research climate science (my research involves superconductors), there are many links between coffee and the climate: clouds of steam<\/a><\/span>, turbulent movement<\/a><\/span>, periodic waves in the cup<\/a><\/span> and of course the greenhouse effect<\/a><\/span>. Additionally, the risks that coffee faces from the effects of climate change are dire.\u00a0Summarised in the most recent report<\/a><\/span> of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (AR5), the risks to coffee are threefold, 1) from a warming climate 2) from more extreme weather events, 3) from pests that have increased due to (1) and (2).<\/p>\n

Currently about 27million acres<\/a><\/span> of the Earth’s land is used to cultivate coffee, most of which is grown by small scale farmers. The effects of warming mean that this area is going to decrease substantially<\/a><\/span>. For us consumers this is going to mean\u00a0a dent in our pockets but for the estimated 120 million people worldwide who depend on coffee growing for their livelihood, it is likely to be catastrophic.<\/p>\n

\"room<\/a>
A good crowd meant a lively discussion at “Avoiding Myth, Mayhem and Myopia”. What should we communicate about climate science and how?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The odd weather patterns that are going to be more common are also going to affect the coffee yield. Severe droughts are likely to happen more frequently (this year’s drought in Brazil has actually prompted the government there to consider importing (robusta) <\/a><\/span>coffee beans). Moreover the combination of higher temperatures and greater rainfall that has been seen recently in Central America has ‘helped’ outbreaks of coffee rust while the berry borer beetle is also benefitting from the warmer climate worldwide (at the expense of the coffee crop).<\/p>\n

Among climate scientists, the issues are clear (for the world rather than just for coffee). Climate change is already happening and it is caused by human activity in the form of greenhouse gas emissions<\/a><\/span>. The problems are how to communicate this knowledge both to policy makers and industry and to the public so that we, as a society, can do something about it. What do each of these groups want to know and how best to reach them? There were discussions at the meeting about how to engage with politicians and to ensure that the message is properly transmitted so as to translate into action but for me (as a non-climate-scientist who drinks a lot of coffee), the interesting bit was about communicating with the public. In this sense it was great to see that the meeting had attracted a diverse audience with both Oxfam and the Green Party represented. Two questions dominated here: How is climate change affecting us now (\/will affect us in the future)? And, what can we each do about it?<\/p>\n

\"Bob<\/a>
The last generation: Bob Ward emphasising the urgent need for scientists to communicate effectively.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In terms of the second question, it seemed agreed that the best thing that we each can do is to reduce our carbon footprint. A concern echoed by the Society’s recent communiqu\u00e9 written with other professional bodies (that you can read here<\/span><\/a>). Simple things like driving less or buying more efficient washing machines (or other household appliances when they need to be replaced) can make a difference. Of course, if you wanted to, you can have a go at calculating your carbon footprint using tools such as this guide by David MacKay<\/a><\/span> (it is a lot easier than it may seem at first glance). It was this aspect of what ‘we’ can do<\/em> that some audience members (including a Green Party representative) thought was a key thing that scientists working with the Royal Meteorological Society needed to communicate. Expect to hear far more about how you can make a difference.<\/p>\n

In general, it seemed that there was a clear feeling that the scientists there wanted to communicate climate science and the science of climate change more insistently and more clearly. Indeed there was a rallying call for us all to increase our science communication by Bob Ward (the Policy and Communications Director at the Grantham Research Institute of the London School of Economics). But how should scientists\u00a0communicate? Is there an intrinsic conflict between the language typically used by scientists and the urgency of the message? Should climate scientists use emotion in their discussions about climate change and what about issues of trust? All these are too much for this piece and so I shall leave those questions until next week, for now perhaps, it would be worth asking people who read this to suggest something that they are doing to reduce their carbon footprint, it doesn’t have to be much and it doesn’t need to be about coffee (though it would be nice if there were some coffee ideas) but please do share your ideas for reducing your carbon footprint, it is likely that they will be useful for others too.<\/p>\n

Next week: Do we speak the same language? Is scientific language a help or a hindrance when it comes to communicating climate change?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last week the Royal Meteorological Society hosted an afternoon of talks and discussion titled “Avoiding Myth, Mayhem and Myopia: the challenge of climate science communication”. The meeting coincided with a social media campaign “#showthelove” which aimed to highlight something that you fear is at risk because of climate change. As coffee is definitely one of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[512,333],"tags":[1429,1434,140,628,556,1430,1431,1436,1433,389,1432,1435],"class_list":["post-3805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sustainabilityenvironmental","category-tea","tag-climate-change","tag-co2-footprint","tag-coffee","tag-environmentalism","tag-individual-responsibility","tag-ipcc","tag-royal-meteorological-society","tag-science-communication","tag-social-responsibility","tag-trust","tag-what-can-i-do-to-help-reduce-climate-change","tag-yes-the-majority-of-scientists-who-work-in-climate-change-think-it-is-caused-by-humans"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4Z8Nz-Zn","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3805"}],"version-history":[{"count":30,"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3805\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3852,"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3805\/revisions\/3852"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beanthinking.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}